ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0010

Daniel Richter et al. (2017), “The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age.” Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22335 — dating source; keep separate from anatomical interpretation.

DOI · Academic research · Primary evidence / text

verifiedRetraction / correction review4 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0010
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0010, AT-0063, AT-0074, AT-0460
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research · Primary evidence / text
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.springer.com/tdm; https://www.springer.com/tdm; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Alternate accepted citation records

  • Richter et al. (2017), The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age
  • The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age

Recorded research uses

AT-0010

Hominin Evolution

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

dating source; keep separate from anatomical interpretation.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0063

Jebel Irhoud

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary thermoluminescence chronology and supporting US-ESR recalculation

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0074

Forbidden Archaeology

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Controlled dating example for revision of early Homo sapiens chronology

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0460

Human Origins

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary geochronology study for the approximately 315 ± 34 thousand-year age estimate associated with the Jebel Irhoud finds.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Hominin Evolution

Open topic
Topic citing this source

Forbidden Archaeology

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Fossil and chronological evidence places early Homo sapiens in Africa by about 300,000 years ago.

Humans are apes, the record contains contemporaneous branches, and Homo sapiens emerged in Africa.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Jebel Irhoud preserves early Homo sapiens-clade fossils associated with a Middle Stone Age context dated to about 315,000 years ago.

Jebel Irhoud preserves a Middle Stone Age archaeological context and early Homo sapiens or Homo sapiens-clade fossils dating to roughly 315,000 years ago.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Controlled evidence does not equate very old toolmaking with anatomically modern humans: Jebel Irhoud is dated to about 315,000 years, while the 3.3-million-year-old Lomekwi tools have no identified Homo sapiens maker.

The extreme-human-antiquity conclusion is weakly supported, and broad coordinated suppression is not demonstrated; scientific rejection of inadequate evidence is not itself proof of a conspiracy.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The cited scientific record does not establish anatomically modern humans millions of years before the accepted Homo sapiens record.

Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed catalog supports fossil, population-history, and archaic-admixture claims; it does not source mythic, theological, or modern alternative-origin claims.

The scientific evidence and mythic source evidence are both strong in their own categories. Problems arise when categories are mixed without evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Cremo and Thompson’s 1993 book claims that anatomically modern humans existed millions of years earlier than accepted chronology and that scientific institutions filtered contrary evidence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Daniel Richter et al. (2017), “The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Middle Stone Age.” Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22335 — dating source; keep separate from anatomical interpretation.

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions