AT-0011
Hominin Evolution
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Omo I minimum-age constraint.
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicAT-0011
Céline M. Vidal et al. (2022), “Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa.” Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04275-8 — Omo I minimum-age constraint.
DOI · Academic research · Primary evidence / text
Source record
This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Alternate accepted citation records
- Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa
Recorded research uses
AT-0461
Human Origins
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Primary volcanic-ash dating study establishing that Omo I predates the Shala eruption, dated to 233 ± 22 thousand years ago.
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicTopics citing it and claims using it
Topic citing this source
Hominin Evolution
Open topicTopic citing this source
Human Origins
Open topicSupporting citation for public claim
Fossil and chronological evidence places early Homo sapiens in Africa by about 300,000 years ago.
Humans are apes, the record contains contemporaneous branches, and Homo sapiens emerged in Africa.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
The identity of the hominins who made the Lomekwi 3 stone artifacts remains unresolved.
Most direct ancestor-descendant links, languages, beliefs, and the identity of many toolmakers are unrecoverable or unresolved.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
The hominin fossil record is better represented as branching than as a single direct ancestor-descendant sequence.
Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
The listed catalog supports fossil, population-history, and archaic-admixture claims; it does not source mythic, theological, or modern alternative-origin claims.
The scientific evidence and mythic source evidence are both strong in their own categories. Problems arise when categories are mixed without evidence.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Homo sapiens evolved in Africa through a complex population process, then dispersed and interbred with archaic humans.
Answer / theory: Homo sapiens evolved in Africa through a complex population process, then dispersed and interbred with archaic humans. What supports it: Fossils, genetics, archaeology, and comparative anatomy. What is weak or disputed: Exact African population structure and timing details. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
Late-Miocene hominin status, early-Homo taxonomy, and the population structure of Homo sapiens emergence within Africa remain contested.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicAccess and actions
Céline M. Vidal et al. (2022), “Age of the oldest known Homo sapiens from eastern Africa.” Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04275-8 — Omo I minimum-age constraint.