AT-0072

Wodak and Oldroyd (1996), ‘Vedic Creationism’: A Further Twist to the Evolution Debate

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review2 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-0072
Accepted usage IDs: AT-0072, AT-1798
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Alternate accepted citation records

‘Vedic Creationism’: A Further Twist to the Evolution Debate

Recorded research uses

AT-0072

Forbidden Archaeology

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed historical and sociological classification of the book's Vedic creationist framework

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

AT-1798

Michael Cremo

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Wodak and Oldroyd's 1996 peer-reviewed social-studies analysis locating *Forbidden Archeology* in its Vedic-creationist intellectual context and separating its large historical compilation from acceptance of its scientific conclusions.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Forbidden Archaeology

Open topic

Topic citing this source

Michael Cremo

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

The 1993 book exists and compiles a large historical anomaly literature within a Vedic-creationist interpretive framework.

The 1993 book exists, cites a large historical anomaly literature, and became an influential source for alternative archaeology and suppressed-history media.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Cremo is documented as an author and primary claimant in alternative human-antiquity literature, not as a mainstream archaeologist or paleoanthropologist.

Answer / theory: He is best described as an alternative-history writer and researcher, not a mainstream archaeologist or paleoanthropologist. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for his role as a writer and claim source.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Cremo's framework is a Vedic-creationist deep-time alternative to standard human evolution, not a young-Earth chronology.

Answer / theory: No. It rejects the standard evolutionary timeline, but uses deep time rather than a recent Earth chronology. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for the distinction.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Cremo and Thompson’s 1993 book claims that anatomically modern humans existed millions of years earlier than accepted chronology and that scientific institutions filtered contrary evidence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Cremo and Thompson argue that humans like us existed in deep geological time and that contrary evidence was filtered out; the catalog documents this claim but does not support it scientifically.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Forbidden Archeology is a primary source for the extreme-antiquity claim, but its catalog record is not scientific validation and the listed human-origins evidence does not overturn Homo sapiens chronology.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.

Open claim topic

Access and actions

Wodak and Oldroyd (1996), ‘Vedic Creationism’: A Further Twist to the Evolution Debate

Open original

Wodak and Oldroyd (1996), ‘Vedic Creationism’: A Further Twist to the Evolution Debate

Source record

Alternate accepted citation records

Recorded research uses

Forbidden Archaeology

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Michael Cremo

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Topics citing it and claims using it

Forbidden Archaeology

Michael Cremo

The 1993 book exists and compiles a large historical anomaly literature within a Vedic-creationist interpretive framework.

Cremo is documented as an author and primary claimant in alternative human-antiquity literature, not as a mainstream archaeologist or paleoanthropologist.

Cremo's framework is a Vedic-creationist deep-time alternative to standard human evolution, not a young-Earth chronology.

Cremo and Thompson’s 1993 book claims that anatomically modern humans existed millions of years earlier than accepted chronology and that scientific institutions filtered contrary evidence.

Cremo and Thompson argue that humans like us existed in deep geological time and that contrary evidence was filtered out; the catalog documents this claim but does not support it scientifically.

Forbidden Archeology is a primary source for the extreme-antiquity claim, but its catalog record is not scientific validation and the listed human-origins evidence does not overturn Homo sapiens chronology.

Access and actions

Search Ancient Inquiry

Ancient Inquiry menu

Visual theme

Prepare an issue report