AT-0143

Replication as a Virtue: What the Monte Verde Debate Tells Us About Archaeological Science (2026)

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review3 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0143
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0143, AT-0154, AT-0174
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Alternate accepted citation records

  • Tune and Miller (2026), Replication as a Virtue: What the Monte Verde Debate Tells Us About Archaeological Science

Recorded research uses

AT-0143

Clovis Culture

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Published critical response and interpretation of the renewed Monte Verde dispute

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0154

Monte Verde

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Published critical response and interpretation of the renewed Monte Verde dispute

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0174

Coastal Migration Theory

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Published critical response and interpretation of the renewed Monte Verde dispute

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Coastal Migration Theory

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The relationship between the Clovis chronological horizon and earlier populations in the Americas remains an active research question.

Researchers continue to examine the origins of Clovis technology, relationships with earlier populations, regional variation, mobility, subsistence, and the transition after the classic interval.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

A 2026 mid-Holocene reinterpretation renewed scrutiny of Monte Verde II's age and site formation, and a published specialist response disputes that reinterpretation.

The age and formation of Monte Verde II are under renewed scrutiny after a 2026 mid-Holocene reinterpretation and strong specialist pushback.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

In the long-standing interpretation, Monte Verde II preserves a pre-Clovis occupation in southern Chile around 14,500–14,800 calibrated years BP; a 2026 redating challenge and published response leave the chronology under active dispute.

Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The timing and exact configuration of Pacific coastal or mixed routes remain unresolved, and Monte Verde's chronology must be treated as a separate active site debate.

The date, exact path, number of movements, role of boats, relationship among early sites, and status of Monte Verde remain unresolved or site-specific.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Replication as a Virtue: What the Monte Verde Debate Tells Us About Archaeological Science (2026)

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions