AT-0158

Haynes, C. Vance (2022). “Evidence for Humans at White Sands… Could Actually Be for Clovis People ~13,000 Years Ago.” _PaleoAmerica_ 8(2): 95–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2022.2039861. Role: younger-age alternative argument.

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0158
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0158
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0158

White Sands Footprints

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

younger-age alternative argument.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

White Sands Footprints

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The association of dated materials with individual track surfaces, site formation, and the narrowest defensible age range remain under technical debate.

Association of dated materials with individual surfaces, site formation, and the narrowest defensible age range.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Human tracks occur in an LGM-age depositional sequence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The 2021 age model placed key White Sands track-bearing layers at about 23,000–21,000 years ago; later radiocarbon and luminescence work supports an LGM-age sequence without directly dating every footprint.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Haynes, C. Vance (2022). “Evidence for Humans at White Sands… Could Actually Be for Clovis People ~13,000 Years Ago.” _PaleoAmerica_ 8(2): 95–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2022.2039861. Role: younger-age alternative argument.

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions