ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0183

Holliday, Vance T., et al. (2024). “Rebuttal of Sweatman, Powell, and West…” _Earth-Science Reviews_ 258: 104961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104961. Role: direct answer; display beside item 8.

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0183
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0183
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/; https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0183

Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

direct answer; display beside item 8.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Proponents and critics continue to dispute marker identity, chronology, replication, and impact physics.

Proponents and critics continue to dispute marker identity, chronology, replication, and impact physics.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

A Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact or airburst remains a minority hypothesis: proponent papers report candidate markers, while major critical reviews find the proposed impact-to-climate, extinction, and cultural-disruption chain unestablished.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Holliday, Vance T., et al. (2024). “Rebuttal of Sweatman, Powell, and West…” _Earth-Science Reviews_ 258: 104961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104961. Role: direct answer; display beside item 8.

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions