AT-0186

Moore, Christopher R., et al. (2026). “Extraterrestrial Nanoparticle Signatures… Wonderkrater.” _F1000Research_ 15:1089, version 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.184551.1. Role: newest proponent report; awaiting peer review at cutoff, not confirmation.

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review2 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0186
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0186, AT-0333
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Access
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/; reuse subject to exact Creative Commons license terms and attribution
Public reproduction
Permitted only under the exact recorded Creative Commons terms and required attribution; verify the asset-specific license before reuse.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Alternate accepted citation records

  • Extraterrestrial Nanoparticle Signatures at the Younger Dryas Boundary (~12,800 years ago) from Wonderkrater, South Africa

Recorded research uses

AT-0186

Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

newest proponent report; awaiting peer review at cutoff, not confirmation.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-0333

Clovis Comet Claim

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

New July 2026 pro-YDIH version-of-record for claim tracking only; F1000Research version 1 was awaiting peer review at the audit cutoff

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis

Open topic
Topic citing this source

Clovis Comet Claim

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Proponents and critics continue to dispute marker identity, chronology, replication, and impact physics.

Proponents and critics continue to dispute marker identity, chronology, replication, and impact physics.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

A comet-caused Younger Dryas is the broader Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis advanced by the 2007 origin paper and rejected by the listed 2023 critical synthesis.

Answer / theory: This is the broader YDIH. It is disputed and rejected by many specialists, with a major 2023 review arguing against it. What supports it: Reported impact proxies by proponents. What is weak or disputed: Dating, reproducibility, marker identification, and mechanism remain major problems. Evidence level: Weak to Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The 2023 critical review concludes that YDIH should be rejected; a July 2026 version-1 report shows that pro-YDIH proxy claims continue but was awaiting peer review at the audit cutoff.

Answer / theory: This is the broader YDIH. It is disputed and rejected by many specialists, with a major 2023 review arguing against it. What supports it: Reported impact proxies by proponents. What is weak or disputed: Dating, reproducibility, marker identification, and mechanism remain major problems. Evidence level: Weak to Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

An ice-sheet impact or airburst is a hypothesis used to explain the absence of a conventional crater; it remains unconfirmed in the listed evidence.

Answer / theory: That is a common proposal. It is possible in principle, but it makes the claim depend heavily on proxy evidence. What supports it: Ice-sheet impact or airburst scenarios could reduce crater preservation. What is weak or disputed: Without a crater, the proxy evidence must be very strong, diagnostic, well dated, and reproducible. Evidence level: Plausible but Unproven.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Without a confirmed crater or airburst field, the 12.9 ka event hypothesis depends on proxy identification, secure dating, and independent replication.

Answer / theory: That is a common proposal. It is possible in principle, but it makes the claim depend heavily on proxy evidence. What supports it: Ice-sheet impact or airburst scenarios could reduce crater preservation. What is weak or disputed: Without a crater, the proxy evidence must be very strong, diagnostic, well dated, and reproducible. Evidence level: Plausible but Unproven.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

A Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact or airburst remains a minority hypothesis: proponent papers report candidate markers, while major critical reviews find the proposed impact-to-climate, extinction, and cultural-disruption chain unestablished.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Firestone et al. proposed a 12.9 ka extraterrestrial event contributing to Younger Dryas cooling and megafaunal extinctions; independent testing and the 2023 review do not establish that it ended Clovis or caused the combined outcomes.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Moore, Christopher R., et al. (2026). “Extraterrestrial Nanoparticle Signatures… Wonderkrater.” _F1000Research_ 15:1089, version 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.184551.1. Role: newest proponent report; awaiting peer review at cutoff, not confirmation.

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions