AT-0205

The Carolina “Bays”: Are They Meteorite Scars?

DOI · Primary evidence / text

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-0205
Accepted usage IDs: AT-0205
Types: DOI
Roles: Primary evidence / text
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0205

Carolina Bays

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary historical claim-origin paper for the meteorite-scar interpretation; use for genealogy, not present-day confirmation.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Carolina Bays

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Carolina Bays are not established as an impact-crater field.

Answer / theory: The best current answer is no, not as a proven crater field. What supports it: They are real elliptical depressions, and older meteorite-scar arguments exist. What is weak or disputed: Shape alone is not impact proof, and age plus sediment evidence does not support a simple single impact event. Evidence level: Weak Evidence / Mostly Speculative

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Impact and ejecta models use Carolina Bays as catastrophe evidence, but the catalog provides no accepted, narrowly dated Younger Dryas crater-field evidence.

Answer / theory: No. They are used in YDIH arguments, but they do not provide a clean dated crater field. What supports it: The claim is visually memorable and easy to spread through maps. What is weak or disputed: The dating, mechanism, source-crater problem, and diagnostic marker chain remain weak. Evidence level: Weak Evidence

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Historical and modern nonstandard sources propose meteorite-scar or ejecta origins for Carolina Bays, but the listed geological and corrective sources do not establish a Younger Dryas impact origin.

Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.