AT-0223

Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-0223
Accepted usage IDs: AT-0223
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: http://www.springer.com/tdm; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0223

Zanclean Flood

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Chronological control for the 5.97 to 5.33 Ma crisis interval

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Zanclean Flood

Supporting citation for public claim

An influential model places rapid final refilling through Gibraltar near 5.33 Ma and estimates discharge far above that of modern rivers.

The Zanclean Flood is a strong geological megaflood topic, but it needs strict chronology control. It is valuable because it shows that massive rapid floods can be real in Earth history. The evidence for a major Mediterranean refilling event is strong, and the catastrophic final-stage model has serious scholarly support.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

The crisis and major refilling are strongly supported, but the exact speed and sequence of final flooding are still debated.

Answer / theory: A major refilling of the Mediterranean at the end of the Messinian Salinity Crisis is strongly supported, while the exact speed and sequence remain debated. What supports it: Evaporites, basin stratigraphy, Gibraltar erosion, seismic evidence, boreholes, modeling, and later megaflood-deposit interpretations. What is weak or disputed: The strongest single-stage catastrophic version remains partly model-dependent. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for refilling; Mixed Evidence for the strongest single-stage catastrophic version

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Messinian conditions included severe restriction and drawdown, but the catalog does not support a uniformly dry Mediterranean throughout the crisis.

Answer / theory: Possibly partly desiccated or strongly drawn down in some models, but total dryness is too simple. What supports it: Thick evaporites and restricted-basin evidence show extreme salinity and water-balance disruption. What is weak or disputed: Basin conditions varied by region and time, and some models include residual water or multiple phases. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

At about 5.33 Ma, the Zanclean refilling cannot be a directly remembered human flood tradition.

Answer / theory: No direct connection is plausible because the event happened about 5.33 million years ago, before humans. What supports it: Chronology alone rules out direct human memory. What is weak or disputed: It can only be used as a geological comparison, not a source tradition. Evidence level: Debunked or Very Unlikely as myth origin

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

The Zanclean refilling is dated to about 5.33 Ma.

Answer / theory: Not directly. The timing makes an Atlantis connection impossible as human history. What supports it: The Mediterranean setting makes the comparison tempting in popular speculation. What is weak or disputed: Plato’s Atlantis story and human civilization are millions of years later. Evidence level: Internet Lore

Open claim topic

Access and actions

Chronology, causes and progression of the Messinian salinity crisis