ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0355

Andrew R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic

URL · Synthesis / reference

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0355
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0355
Types
URL
Roles
Synthesis / reference
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-0355

Gilgamesh Flood

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Critical edition, translation, and manuscript history for the Standard Babylonian epic

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Tablet XI belongs to a developed Gilgamesh composition whose flood episode is studied within the evolving Mesopotamian flood-text tradition.

Tablet XI and Atrahasis share plot, motifs, and close verbal material, indicating literary dependence or use of a closely related textual tradition.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Critical and compositional scholarship reconstructs how the flood episode entered the evolving Gilgamesh epic, while the exact editorial history remains interpretive.

Scholars continue to reconstruct when and how the flood account entered the evolving Gilgamesh epic and which recension or source stream its editor used.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

George Smith’s historical publication documents the modern Genesis comparison, but the listed sources do not establish that the surviving K.3375 copy was Genesis’s line-by-line source.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that the Gilgamesh flood episode directly supplied Genesis is documented in the comparison tradition but is not established as a line-by-line dependence on the surviving tablet.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Andrew R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions