ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0366

The Divine Appointment of the First Antediluvian King: Newly Recovered Content from the Ur Version of the Sumerian Flood Story

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0366
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0366
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0366

Eridu Genesis

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Philological update: newly recovered Ur-version content and antediluvian-kingship context that prevents reliance on the 1981 reconstruction alone.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

The Sumerian Flood Story is an early member of the Mesopotamian flood-text tradition related in scholarship to later Akkadian compositions; a single linear transmission route is not established.

The Eridu Genesis is a high-value child page under Flood Myths. It should be treated as one of the strongest ancient textual anchors for the Mesopotamian flood tradition and linked closely with Atrahasis, Gilgamesh, Genesis, the Sumerian King List, Eridu, and Antediluvian World.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed sources establish a fragmentary Sumerian literary composition; they are not geological evidence for a worldwide inundation.

Answer / theory: No. It proves an ancient literary flood tradition, not a global geological event. What supports it: The text clearly contains flood-survivor motifs. What is weak or disputed: It does not supply geological evidence for worldwide inundation. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for text; Weak Evidence for global flood geology.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The story is fragmentary and reconstructed from broken textual evidence.

Answer / theory: The source is fragmentary, and full retellings depend partly on reconstruction. What supports it: Damaged lines, missing sections, and comparison-dependent interpretation shape modern translations. What is weak or disputed: Some public summaries make the story sound more complete than the evidence allows. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Eridu Genesis preserves a fragmentary Sumerian flood story related in scholarship to later Mesopotamian flood compositions; this catalog does not establish the route into biblical tradition.

Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Divine Appointment of the First Antediluvian King: Newly Recovered Content from the Ur Version of the Sumerian Flood Story

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions