ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0403

1882 -The Sacred Books Of East Vol 12 Of 50 Satapatha Brahmana Part 1 Of 5

URL · Synthesis / reference

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0403
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0403
Types
URL
Roles
Synthesis / reference
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-0403

Flood Survivor Archetype

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Julius Eggeling translation locator for Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 1.8.1; supports Manu and the fish while keeping the Vedic witness distinct from later Matsya narratives.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Flood Survivor Archetype

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed Sumerian, Akkadian, biblical, Vedic, and classical texts each preserve a survivor figure or pair who lives through a destructive flood.

The archetype is strongly supported by ancient texts. Its use as proof of one literal global catastrophe or one survivor civilization is not established.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The source catalog establishes the existence of multiple flood-survivor narratives; literary recurrence alone does not establish a shared geological event.

Answer / theory: No. It proves that many traditions tell survival-through-flood stories. Geological proof requires independent physical evidence. What supports it: Multiple textual traditions. What is weak or disputed: Global geological interpretation. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for mythic pattern, Weak Evidence for global flood proof.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa presents Manu as a flood survivor warned by a fish; “the Indian Noah” is a modern comparison, not the source’s wording.

Answer / theory: Manu is an Indian flood survivor and new ancestor figure, but calling him simply "the Indian Noah" can flatten the Indian source context. What supports it: Manu is warned, builds a ship, survives a flood, and renews life through sacrifice. What is weak or disputed: Direct dependence on biblical tradition is not required to explain the story. Evidence level: Strong Evidence as parallel, mixed evidence for direct relationship.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

1882 -The Sacred Books Of East Vol 12 Of 50 Satapatha Brahmana Part 1 Of 5

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions