AT-0407
Taş Tepeler
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Excavation interpretation/feasting
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicAT-0407
Excavation interpretation/feasting: [T3] Oliver Dietrich, Manfred Heun, Jens Notroff, Klaus Schmidt, and Martin Zarnkow, “The Role of Cult and Feasting in the Emergence of Neolithic Communities: New Evidence from Göbekli Tepe, South-eastern Turkey,” Antiquity 86, no. 333 (2012): 674–695, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00047840.
DOI · Academic research
Source record
This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Alternate accepted citation records
- Feasting/subsistence interpretation: [G3] Dietrich et al., “Role of Cult and Feasting,” Antiquity 86 (2012): 674–695, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00047840.
- Oliver Dietrich et al., “The role of cult and feasting in the emergence of Neolithic communities” (2012)
- The role of cult and feasting in the emergence of Neolithic communities. New evidence from Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey
Recorded research uses
AT-0413
Göbekli Tepe
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Feasting/subsistence interpretation
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicAT-1593
Origin of Religion
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Excavator-side interpretation of monumentality, gathering, and feasting at Göbekli Tepe; label as an archaeological interpretation rather than proof of religion's origin.
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicAT-1745
Ice Age Civilization Theory
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Peer-reviewed archaeological interpretation of early Neolithic monumentality and communal practice; not evidence for a prior high-technology empire.
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicAT-1792
Klaus Schmidt
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here
Excavator-authored evidence for cult, feasting, and community formation
What this usage does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topicTopics citing it and claims using it
Topic citing this source
Taş Tepeler
Open topicTopic citing this source
Göbekli Tepe
Open topicTopic citing this source
Origin of Religion
Open topicTopic citing this source
Ice Age Civilization Theory
Open topicTopic citing this source
Klaus Schmidt
Open topicSupporting citation for public claim
Relationships among sites, subsistence and sedentism, special-building functions, and causes of food-system change remain active research questions.
Site relationships, subsistence, sedentism, special-building functions, and the causes of food-system change.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
The Taş Tepeler programme coordinates research on southeastern Anatolian sites spanning the tenth through seventh millennia BCE, including early Neolithic sites with monumental or symbolic remains.
Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Göbekli Tepe’s large special buildings belonged to a settlement continuum rather than an isolated temple-only category.
Large special or communal buildings existed within a settled and regionally connected Neolithic landscape.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Building functions, settlement intensity, structure histories, subsistence practices, and the identities represented by the pillars remain active research questions.
Building functions, settlement intensity, structure biographies, subsistence, and the identities represented by pillars.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Göbekli Tepe is an early Pre-Pottery Neolithic site with large special buildings and anthropomorphic T-shaped pillars.
Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Bellah and Whitehouse offer multi-factor frameworks involving ritual, cognition, social transmission, and symbolic life; these are models rather than a settled origin sequence.
The Origin of Religion is best understood as a long, layered development rather than a single invention. It grew from human symbolic capacity, social life, death awareness, ritual, story, landscape, altered states, and group memory.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Archaeology can identify material patterns consistent with symbolic or ritual behavior, but it cannot directly recover ancient belief from artifacts alone.
The Origin of Religion is best understood as a long, layered development rather than a single invention. It grew from human symbolic capacity, social life, death awareness, ritual, story, landscape, altered states, and group memory.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Shell beads and monument or feasting evidence support symbolic or ritual interpretation in specific contexts; they do not recover complete theology, and burial inferences require taphonomic checks.
The Origin of Religion is best understood as a long, layered development rather than a single invention. It grew from human symbolic capacity, social life, death awareness, ritual, story, landscape, altered states, and group memory.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
The represented record accumulates through distinct symbolic and ritual indicators rather than one identifiable first religious event.
Answer / theory: There is no single known date. Evidence accumulates through symbolic and ritual behavior before written religion. What supports it: Burials, art, ornaments, ritual sites, and later temples. What is weak or disputed: Exact beliefs are usually unrecoverable. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Middle Stone Age ornaments and pre-state Neolithic gathering or feasting interpretations show symbolic and ritual evidence before written religious institutions.
Answer / theory: There is no single known date. Evidence accumulates through symbolic and ritual behavior before written religion. What supports it: Burials, art, ornaments, ritual sites, and later temples. What is weak or disputed: Exact beliefs are usually unrecoverable. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Schmidt's excavation and later scholarship made ritual, feasting, and monumentality important to debates over early Neolithic community formation, without establishing a simple ritual-before-agriculture sequence.
The site and Schmidt's role are well supported. Ritual importance is strongly supported. The strict temple-only and lost-civilization readings are weaker.
Open claim topicSupporting citation for public claim
Schmidt argued for a strong ritual role in early community formation; later critique and cereal-processing evidence complicate a temple-only or one-way causal model.
Answer / theory: He argued that ritual helped shape early settlement, but later evidence makes the slogan too simple. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
Regional and site studies document recurring architectural or representational features across several early Neolithic sites in southeastern Anatolia, supporting controlled comparison.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
The official Taş Tepeler portal defines a modern research programme; that roster is not evidence that the participating sites formed one prehistoric religion or polity.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
Current archaeological and comparative sources do not identify a single date or place at which religion began.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
The listed evidence does not support reducing religion's origin to one cause such as aliens, drugs, fear of death, elite control, or lost-civilization memory.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
The global advanced Ice Age civilization tracked in AT-1747 is not established by the catalog's evidence for postglacial inundation, Paleolithic maritime skill, art, or early Neolithic monumentality.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
Submerged coastlines and evidence of Paleolithic maritime or artistic complexity do not by themselves demonstrate a single global civilization.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
The listed archaeological sources do not support lost high technology at Göbekli Tepe.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicLimiting / critical citation for public claim
The listed archaeological sources provide no evidence that the Göbekli Tepe pillars depict extraterrestrials or record alien contact.
The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topicAccess and actions
Excavation interpretation/feasting: [T3] Oliver Dietrich, Manfred Heun, Jens Notroff, Klaus Schmidt, and Martin Zarnkow, “The Role of Cult and Feasting in the Emergence of Neolithic Communities: New Evidence from Göbekli Tepe, South-eastern Turkey,” Antiquity 86, no. 333 (2012): 674–695, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00047840.