AT-0477

Genesis 2:7

URL · Primary evidence / text

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0477
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0477
Types
URL
Roles
Primary evidence / text
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-0477

Creation from Clay

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary biblical locator for formation of the human from dust of the ground and animation by the breath of life.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Creation from Clay

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed biblical, Akkadian, Greek, and Islamic sources attest distinct traditions in which a human or humanity is formed from earth, dust, or clay.

The motif is strongly documented, but modern biological interpretations are unsupported.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Genesis 2:7 pairs dust with breath, Atraḫasīs pairs clay with divine flesh or blood, and Qur’an 15:26 describes humanity as created from sounding clay.

Answer / theory: Clay is shapeable, earthly, mortal, and familiar as a craft material. What supports it: Many traditions use pottery or shaping imagery. What is weak or disputed: One global origin for the motif is not proven. Evidence level: Strong Evidence as motif, mixed for transmission.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Genesis 2:7 and Atraḫasīs can be compared as distinct earth-material human-formation traditions, but this catalog does not establish direct copying.

Answer / theory: Genesis belongs to a wider ancient Near Eastern world with shared motifs, but it reshapes them theologically. What supports it: Clay, divine life, garden, flood, and ancient Near Eastern parallels. What is weak or disputed: Simple copying is too blunt. Evidence level: Plausible but nuanced.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed creation texts describe earth, clay, breath, or divine material; they do not provide genetic or laboratory evidence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Genesis 2:7

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions