ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0600

The Sumerian King List

URL · Synthesis / reference

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag2 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0600
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0600, AT-1620
Types
URL
Roles
Synthesis / reference
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-0600

Sumerian King List

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Catalogue locator for Jacobsen’s foundational 1939 critical edition and study

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-1620

Origin of Kingship

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Thorkild Jacobsen's foundational edition and study of the composition and manuscripts; use for textual history and historiography while checking later manuscript and chronology research separately.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Sumerian King List

Open topic
Topic citing this source

Origin of Kingship

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Sumerian King List is a layered kingship composition, and the listed historical and numerical studies do not support treating its antediluvian section as an accurate literal chronology.

The text is strongly verifiable, but the literal interpretation is not.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Sumerian King List is an ancient cuneiform composition preserved through multiple manuscript witnesses and reconstructed in composite editions.

Answer / theory: Yes. It is a real ancient cuneiform text preserved in multiple manuscripts. What supports it: Museum objects, transliterations, translations, and academic editions. What is weak or disputed: Some public versions oversimplify it as one fixed text. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Sumerian King List attests antediluvian reign lengths and a flood break as literary tradition, not as biological evidence for superhuman lifespans.

Answer / theory: It proves that a literary tradition said this, not that the reign lengths were biologically literal. What supports it: The text itself includes pre-flood kings and a flood break. What is weak or disputed: Literal interpretation of symbolic or ideological reign lengths. Evidence level: Mythic but source-supported.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The Sumerian King List presents kingship as descending from heaven; it does not establish that non-human beings literally gave rulership to humans.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Sumerian King List

Open original 1Open original 2

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions