AT-0848

U-Pb zircon dating evidence for a Pleistocene Sarasvati River and capture of the Yamuna River

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0848
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0848
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0848

Sarasvati River Theory

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Detrital-zircon provenance study for older major river activity and river capture; Pleistocene evidence must not be transferred unqualified to Mature Harappan chronology.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Sarasvati River Theory

Open topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The catalog establishes Rigvedic Sarasvati attestation and real Ghaggar-Hakra river history, but it does not establish that one mighty perennial Himalayan river sustained Mature Harappan urbanism.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Sarasvati is textually attested in the Rigveda; identifying it with a specific Holocene Ghaggar-Hakra channel remains disputed.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Identifying the Rigvedic Sarasvati with Ghaggar-Hakra is a plausible historical-geography hypothesis, but the listed studies disagree on flow timing and do not settle textual identity.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

U-Pb zircon dating evidence for a Pleistocene Sarasvati River and capture of the Yamuna River

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions