ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0865

Evidence for Indo-Roman Trade from Bet Dwarka Waters, West Coast of India

DOI · Primary evidence / text

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0865
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0865
Types
DOI
Roles
Primary evidence / text
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0865

Dwarka

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary marine-archaeology source for a historically bounded trade horizon at Bet Dwarka; demonstrates why finds from Bet Dwarka, main Dwarka, and different periods must not be pooled.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Modern Dwarka is a living pilgrimage place associated with Krishna, and the wider Dwarka and Bet Dwarka waters preserve evidence of historically varied maritime activity.

Answer / theory: Yes. Modern Dwarka is real, and the region has strong sacred and historical importance. What supports it: Living city, pilgrimage tradition, archaeology, and maritime finds. What is weak or disputed: Which archaeological layer, if any, corresponds to the epic city. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for the place, Mixed Evidence for epic identification.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Stone anchors from Dwarka and a separate Indo-Roman horizon at Bet Dwarka document maritime activity; neither assemblage identifies Krishna's epic city.

Answer / theory: They found underwater and coastal evidence near Dwarka, but direct identification with Krishna's city remains unproven. What supports it: Anchors, structural reports, and traditional location. What is weak or disputed: Lack of direct labels, secure dating, and clear connection to the epic narrative. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Rao's interpretation documents the modern identification claim, but the listed anchors, Bet Dwarka trade evidence, and textual study do not prove that underwater remains are Krishna's literal Mahabharata city.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Evidence for Indo-Roman Trade from Bet Dwarka Waters, West Coast of India

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions