AT-0946

Do you believe in Ram Setu? Adam's Bridge, epistemic plurality and colonial legacy

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0946
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0946
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Access
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Rights
no reusable-content license identified; internal research and citation/linking only; no redistribution inferred
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0946

Rama's Bridge / Adam's Bridge

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Island Studies Journal analysis of colonial naming, political epistemologies, and Sethusamudram debate; contextualizes competing public claims without serving as proof for either natural formation mechanisms or ancient construction.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Rama's Bridge / Adam's Bridge

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Remote-sensing and reception studies document a mappable shoal chain and its enduring Ramayana-related cultural significance.

The strongest support is for the existence of the feature and its long cultural importance. The shoal chain is real. The Ramayana bridge story is real as a religious and literary tradition. The Rameswaram region has major sacred significance. The strongest scientific support favors natural coastal formation, with ongoing technical debate about sediment history and sea-level evolution.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

A chain of shoals between India and Sri Lanka is a real, mappable physical feature.

The strongest support is for the existence of the feature and its long cultural importance. The shoal chain is real. The Ramayana bridge story is real as a religious and literary tradition. The Rameswaram region has major sacred significance. The strongest scientific support favors natural coastal formation, with ongoing technical debate about sediment history and sea-level evolution.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa textual tradition includes Rama's crossing to Lanka, and later regional reception gives that narrative continuing religious and cultural significance.

The strongest support is for the existence of the feature and its long cultural importance. The shoal chain is real. The Ramayana bridge story is real as a religious and literary tradition. The Rameswaram region has major sacred significance. The strongest scientific support favors natural coastal formation, with ongoing technical debate about sediment history and sea-level evolution.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Ram Setu and Rameswaram landscape carries documented religious, political, and cultural significance in contemporary debate.

The strongest support is for the existence of the feature and its long cultural importance. The shoal chain is real. The Ramayana bridge story is real as a religious and literary tradition. The Rameswaram region has major sacred significance. The strongest scientific support favors natural coastal formation, with ongoing technical debate about sediment history and sea-level evolution.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

AT-0942 maps the shoal chain by remote sensing, but imagery alone cannot identify builders, a construction date, or cultural attribution.

Weak versions treat satellite images as proof of construction, use devotional or political claims as geology, claim fixed ages without explaining what material was dated, or use the word bridge to imply engineering when it can also describe a natural chain of shoals.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed marine, remote-sensing, and textual sources do not establish that the entire shoal chain is an engineered ancient bridge built as narrated in the Ramayana.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

AT-0941 documents late-Pleistocene and Holocene palaeogeographic and sea-level change in the Ramasetu region; it does not report an engineered bridge.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Do you believe in Ram Setu? Adam's Bridge, epistemic plurality and colonial legacy

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions