AT-1017

Predicting pre-Columbian anthropogenic soils in Amazonia

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-1017
Accepted usage IDs: AT-1017
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: https://royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1017

Amazonian Dark Earth / Terra Preta

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed spatial model for the distribution of anthropogenic soils and pre-Columbian impact; useful for basin-scale inference only with survey-bias and ground-verification limits.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Amazonian Dark Earth / Terra Preta

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Multiple archaeological and soil studies support anthropogenic or strongly human-influenced dark earths in many contexts, with uneven distribution across the basin.

Answer / theory: Many Terra Preta deposits are strongly human-influenced or anthropogenic. What supports it: Pottery, charcoal, bones, food remains, nutrients, and settlement contexts. What is weak or disputed: How intentional every deposit was remains debated. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for human influence, mixed for uniform intentional design.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Terra Preta is one strong, regionally variable line of evidence for long-term Indigenous landscape management before European conquest.

Answer / theory: No. Terra Preta is one strong sign of long-term Indigenous landscape management in many regions. What supports it: Anthropogenic soils, earthworks, domesticated plants, and settlement archaeology. What is weak or disputed: The scale and distribution of human impact varied across the basin. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for human impact, mixed for total scale.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Dark earth evidence alone does not establish urban scale, political unity, or a single lost Amazonian civilization.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.

Open claim topic

Access and actions

Predicting pre-Columbian anthropogenic soils in Amazonia

Open original

Predicting pre-Columbian anthropogenic soils in Amazonia

Source record

Recorded research uses

Amazonian Dark Earth / Terra Preta

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Topics citing it and claims using it

Amazonian Dark Earth / Terra Preta

Multiple archaeological and soil studies support anthropogenic or strongly human-influenced dark earths in many contexts, with uneven distribution across the basin.

Terra Preta is one strong, regionally variable line of evidence for long-term Indigenous landscape management before European conquest.

Dark earth evidence alone does not establish urban scale, political unity, or a single lost Amazonian civilization.

Access and actions

Search Ancient Inquiry

Ancient Inquiry menu

Visual theme

Prepare an issue report