AT-1051

Amazonia 1492: Pristine Forest or Cultural Parkland?

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-1051
Accepted usage IDs: AT-1051
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1051

Casarabe Culture / Llanos de Mojos / Kuhikugu / Upper Xingu

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed Upper Xingu baseline for archaeology conducted with Kuikuro collaborators and the cultural-parkland interpretation.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Casarabe Culture / Llanos de Mojos / Kuhikugu / Upper Xingu

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Casarabe and Upper Xingu studies document distinct planned precolonial settlement landscapes; low-density urbanism is supported in those cases but should not be generalized to all of the Llanos de Mojos or Amazonia.

The features are visible, mapped, and increasingly ground-checked. The disputed part is how to name and model the societies, not whether the features exist.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Casarabe/Llanos de Mojos and Kuhikugu/Upper Xingu are geographically and culturally distinct cases; comparison does not make them one civilization.

Answer / theory: No. They are comparative examples from different regions with different cultural histories. What supports it: Distinct geography, archaeology, chronology, and cultural context. What is weak or disputed: Some public summaries collapse Amazonian cases into one civilization. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Calling Casarabe or Upper Xingu places “lost cities” can imply absence from local or Indigenous knowledge and can obscure the low-density landscape evidence documented by archaeology.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.