ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1085

A propos du trilithon de Baalbek. Le transport et la mise en oeuvre des mégalithes

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1085
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1085
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1085

Baalbek

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Specialist architectural-engineering study of transport and setting hypotheses for the Trilithon; verifies that human mechanical models have been investigated.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Specialist studies investigate human quarrying and transport models for Baalbek’s Trilithon, while the exact operational sequence remains unresolved.

Answer / theory: Exact details are debated, but dragging with capstans, sledges, ramps, and prepared paths is more plausible than lifting them vertically. What supports it: Roman engineering capability, quarry proximity, stone bedding, and practical transport models. What is weak or disputed: No full ancient construction manual survives for the Baalbek stones. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence for exact method, strong evidence for human engineering context.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Cataloged heritage, quarry, and transport studies place Baalbek’s monumental stones in a Roman sanctuary and construction context and do not support lost-civilization or ancient-astronaut builders.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

No cataloged archaeological source identifies Baalbek’s platform as a landing site or as Anunnaki infrastructure.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

A propos du trilithon de Baalbek. Le transport et la mise en oeuvre des mégalithes

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions