ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1097

The Stones of Tiahuanaco: A Study of Architecture and Construction

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1097
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1097
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1097

Puma Punku

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Specialist monograph on Tiwanaku stone architecture, construction, carving, assembly, and reconstruction; use for measured technical discussion without converting unresolved steps into machine evidence.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Tiwanaku stoneworkers shaped and assembled difficult sandstone and andesite forms, while the exact tool sequence for every feature remains unresolved.

Answer / theory: Yes, though some exact methods remain debated. What supports it: Experimental work, unfinished stones, comparative stoneworking, and regional craft evidence. What is weak or disputed: Complete reconstruction of every tool and stage. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for human workmanship, Mixed Evidence for exact method.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Puma Punku's present fragmentary layout reflects a ruined and reconstructed monument, but the catalog does not establish one complete destruction and displacement sequence.

Answer / theory: Ruin, collapse, looting, stone reuse, weathering, disturbance, and incomplete reconstruction all likely contribute. What supports it: Site history and archaeological disturbance. What is weak or disputed: The exact sequence of destruction and displacement. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Puma Punku proves lost high technology, machine cutting, or ancient alien construction is unsupported by its Tiwanaku chronology and architecture.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Puma Punku's stonework proves alien construction is unsupported by its excavated Tiwanaku chronology and architecture.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Stones of Tiahuanaco: A Study of Architecture and Construction

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions