ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1100

A Bayesian Re-Assessment of the Earliest Radiocarbon Dates from Tiwanaku, Bolivia

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1100
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1100
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1100

Tiwanaku

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed chronology study reassessing unreliable early dates and modeling Tiwanaku's foundation around AD 110, with explicit uncertainty; essential protection against both extreme-antiquity claims and overconfident phase dates.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Tiwanaku's major development predates the Inca Empire.

Answer / theory: No. Tiwanaku is pre-Inca. The Inca later revered and reinterpreted the site. What supports it: Chronology, archaeology, and cultural differences. What is weak or disputed: How exactly Inca ritual used Tiwanaku remains. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Tiwanaku's dated monuments, ritual architecture, and agricultural systems document a sophisticated human Andean society.

Answer / theory: No. It proves a sophisticated Andean society. What supports it: Architecture, agriculture, settlement, iconography, and chronology. What is weak or disputed: Alien claims lack direct evidence. Evidence level: Weak Evidence for aliens.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Tiwanaku was built by an unknown lost civilization or ancient astronauts rather than Tiwanaku communities is unsupported by the cataloged chronology, agriculture, and architecture.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

A Bayesian Re-Assessment of the Earliest Radiocarbon Dates from Tiwanaku, Bolivia

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions