ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1107

Megalith quarries for Stonehenge's bluestones

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1107
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1107
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Access
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Rights
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms; internal research and citation/linking only; no redistribution inferred
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1107

Stonehenge

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed excavation argument for Neolithic quarrying at two Preseli outcrops; use with the paper's site-specific evidence and ongoing debate over quarry interpretation and transport routes.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Neolithic and Early Bronze Age communities in Britain built Stonehenge in successive phases over many generations.

Answer / theory: Neolithic and Early Bronze Age communities in Britain built it over many generations. What supports it: Archaeology, dating, tools, burials, settlement context, and landscape evidence. What is weak or disputed: Names, languages, exact social identities, and leadership structures are unknown. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Geological sourcing and quarry evidence support substantial human movement of Stonehenge stones, but exact routes and transport methods remain unresolved and may differ by stone.

Answer / theory: Likely through organized human transport using ropes, sledges, rollers, water routes where possible, and large labor groups. What supports it: Stone sourcing, quarry evidence, ethnographic analogy, and experimental archaeology. What is weak or disputed: Exact routes and whether every stone followed the same process. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for human transport, Mixed Evidence for exact route.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Stonehenge required ancient aliens or lost advanced technology is unsupported by its archaeological phases, landscape context, and stone-provenance evidence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Megalith quarries for Stonehenge's bluestones

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions