ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1126

A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1126
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1126
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Access
acquired-validated-registered-public-or-tdm-copy
Rights
https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining; https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining; internal research and citation/linking only; no redistribution inferred
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1126

Newgrange

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed ancient-DNA study reporting kinship and the Newgrange individual's first-degree-incest parentage; relevant to a proposed socially elevated stratum, not proof of one uniform god-king system for Neolithic Ireland.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Newgrange is dated to approximately 3200 BCE.

Answer / theory: Yes, Newgrange is generally dated around 3200 BCE, earlier than the main Giza pyramids. What supports it: Archaeological dating and heritage records support the Neolithic date. What is weak or disputed: Being older than the pyramids does not prove a connection to Egypt. Evidence level: Strong Evidence
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Newgrange’s passage-tomb architecture and solstitial light effect demonstrate sophisticated Neolithic monument building and sky awareness.

Answer / theory: No. It proves sophisticated Neolithic monument building and astronomical awareness. What supports it: The construction and solstice alignment are impressive and real. What is weak or disputed: Lost-civilization claims assume transmission beyond the evidence. Evidence level: Weak Evidence
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

A Druid-builder attribution is incompatible with Newgrange’s circa-3200 BCE Neolithic chronology.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

A dynastic elite in monumental Neolithic society

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions