AT-1156

A new archaeological field survey of the site of Nan Madol, Pohnpei

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1156
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1156
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1156

Nan Madol

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed field survey documenting Nan Madol's archaeological landscape and refining site-scale observations; supports an Indigenous Pohnpeian archaeological framework rather than a lost-continent attribution.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Nan Madol's monumental complex is securely situated within Pohnpeian history and Saudeleur-era chiefly ceremonial authority.

Answer / theory: The strongest evidence points to Pohnpeian builders connected to Saudeleur-era chiefly authority. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that ancestral Pohnpeians could not have built Nan Madol and that it requires a lost advanced civilization is unsupported by the cataloged chronology, sourcing, survey, and political context.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Pohnpeian stone-moving traditions are evidence about cultural memory and meaning; the catalog does not establish their supernatural elements as a literal physical technology.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

A new archaeological field survey of the site of Nan Madol, Pohnpei

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions