ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1163

The walking moai hypothesis: Archaeological evidence, experimental validation, and response to critics

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1163
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1163
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/; https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license; http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029; https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1163

Easter Island

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed 2025 Journal of Archaeological Science assessment combining archaeological evidence, experiment, and modeling for upright rope-assisted transport; supports feasibility and a strong hypothesis, not proof that every moai followed one method.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Rapa Nui people created the moai and ahu within an Indigenous Polynesian cultural landscape.

Answer / theory: No strong evidence supports this. Archaeological evidence supports Rapa Nui human production. Evidence level: Debunked or Very Unlikely.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Upright rope-assisted walking is experimentally and archaeologically supported as a feasible moai transport hypothesis, not a demonstrated universal method.

Answer / theory: Upright rope-assisted walking is a strong candidate, but transport may have varied by statue and context. Evidence level: Plausible but Unproven to Strong for feasibility.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

No cataloged archaeological source supports alien construction of the moai.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The walking moai hypothesis: Archaeological evidence, experimental validation, and response to critics

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions