AT-1189

Retraction and Reflection: The Gunung Padang Controversy and the Challenges of Peer Review in Archaeological Prospection

DOI · Claim origin / tracking

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1189
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1189
Types
DOI
Roles
Claim origin / tracking
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/; not cleared
Public reproduction
Permitted only under the exact recorded Creative Commons terms and required attribution; verify the asset-specific license before reuse.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1189

Gunung Padang

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Eileen G. Ernenwein's 2025 peer-review and archaeological-prospection reflection; use for how geophysical methods and review failures can be recruited into fringe narratives, not as a substitute for excavation data.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Gunung Padang is an extremely ancient buried pyramid was advanced in AT-1187, which is retracted and is not live supporting evidence.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Retraction and Reflection: The Gunung Padang Controversy and the Challenges of Peer Review in Archaeological Prospection

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions