ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1194

Lichenometric dating and the nature of the excavation of the Huashan Grottoes, East China

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1194
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1194
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/; https://www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1194

Longyou Caves / Huashan Grottoes

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Zhu, Wu, Zhu, Li, and Zhang's 2013 follow-up on Huashan dating and excavation interpretation; a site-specific comparison source, not a proxy date for Longyou.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Longyou Caves / Huashan Grottoes

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Longyou and Huashan are documented artificial rock-cut cavern or grotto systems.

Answer / theory: No. They are artificial rock-cut caverns. What supports it: Carved surfaces, repeated tool marks, pillars, and chamber geometry. What is weak or disputed: The exact date and purpose. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Huashan lichenometric studies estimate historical rather than deep-prehistoric excavation, subject to exposure-age model assumptions.

Answer / theory: Not likely based on current dating. Huashan appears much later. What supports it: Lichenometric dating of Huashan points to late Ming. What is weak or disputed: Longyou's exact date remains less secure. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The claim that Longyou and Huashan prove lost advanced excavation technology is unsupported by the cataloged engineering and dating studies.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

No cataloged source documents advanced machinery, non-human builders, or a lost technological chain for either site.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The catalog does not establish that Longyou and Huashan were built by the same community or in the same period.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Lichenometric dating and the nature of the excavation of the Huashan Grottoes, East China

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions