ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1266

Stonehenge Major Lunar Standstill

URL · Synthesis / reference

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1266
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1266
Types
URL
Roles
Synthesis / reference
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1266

Stonehenge Astronomy

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

English Heritage research and public-observation page framing a lunar design connection as a question under investigation, not as equivalent in certainty to the solstitial axis.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Stonehenge Astronomy

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Stonehenge's major axis is physically aligned with midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset; the exact prehistoric meaning remains interpretive.

The alignment is physical and measurable, but intention and meaning require archaeological interpretation.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The solstitial orientation supports deliberate celestial design but not a recorded ceremony or a modern-style precision observatory.

Answer / theory: Yes, the main axis is strongly connected to midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset. What supports it: Monument layout and Avenue alignment. What is weak or disputed: Exact ritual meaning is not directly recorded. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

A relationship between the Station Stones and major lunar standstill directions remains an active research hypothesis, not a settled reconstruction of prehistoric use.

Answer / theory: Possibly in part, especially through the Station Stones and lunar standstill directions. What supports it: Plausible geometry and modern standstill studies. What is weak or disputed: Intentionality and exact prehistoric use remain debated. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Stonehenge Major Lunar Standstill

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions