ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1392

The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1392
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1392
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1392

Nag Hammadi Library

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Hugo Lundhaug and Lance Jenott's codicological and historical argument for a monastic ownership/use context; a substantial scholarly hypothesis, not a settled identification of the depositors or burial motive.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Nag Hammadi Library

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Nag Hammadi discovery comprises twelve Coptic codices plus material conventionally designated a thirteenth and preserves fifty-two tractate copies, including duplicates.

The Nag Hammadi Library is one of the most important source collections for this project. It gives direct access to texts that shaped modern understanding of Gnosticism, early Christian diversity, Hermetic overlap, and non-canonical traditions.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The codices document diverse noncanonical and alternative Christian-era writings; their survival does not establish that they formed one suppressed Bible.

Answer / theory: No. It proves that non-canonical and alternative Christian-era texts existed and survived, not that one hidden Bible was erased. What supports it: Manuscript discovery and textual diversity. What is weak or disputed: A single suppression story does not match the evidence. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for diversity; Weak Evidence for conspiracy framing.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions