AT-1399

On the Origin of the World — Coptic Gnostic Library

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1399
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1399
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1399

Gnostic Creation Texts

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Critical-edition environment for the tractate and its witnesses; required to distinguish this cosmology from the Apocryphon of John, Valentinian texts and later summaries.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Gnostic Creation Texts

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The project label covers several distinct late-antique creation texts and recensions, not one uniform Gnostic creation narrative.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The catalog directly documents the Apocryphon of John, Hypostasis of the Archons, and On the Origin of the World as distinct Coptic creation-related works.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Hypostasis of the Archons and On the Origin of the World reread Genesis within distinct late-antique mythic frameworks.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

In some cataloged tractates, a lower creator or rulers are portrayed as subordinate or flawed within mythic-theological narratives; wording and roles vary by work.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Sophia is a major figure in several creation narratives represented by the Apocryphon of John and On the Origin of the World, but her role is not uniform.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Some texts describe a higher divine element in humanity within a lower cosmic order; terminology and salvation models must be established text by text.

Gnostic Creation Texts are important because they preserve alternative late antique ways of reading creation, Genesis, divine authority, and human awakening. They belong in the map as a major source bridge between Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism, archons, Eden, and forbidden knowledge.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Some texts portray a lower creator as ignorant, arrogant, or flawed, but the characterization and cosmological role differ by text and recension.

Answer / theory: Some texts portray the lower creator as ignorant, arrogant, or flawed, but the details vary by text. What supports it: Apocryphon of John and related texts. What is weak or disputed: A simple “all Gnostics believed this” claim is too broad. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for some texts; Mixed Evidence as a universal claim.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed texts preserve late-antique mythic reinterpretations of creation; alien, simulation, and modern conspiracy readings are not established by these sources.

Claim extracted from the installed dossier scorecard.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

On the Origin of the World — Coptic Gnostic Library

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions