AT-1401

Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius

DOI · Academic research · Primary evidence / text

verifiedRetraction / correction review3 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1401
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1401, AT-1409, AT-1850
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research · Primary evidence / text
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Alternate accepted citation records

  • Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a New English Translation, with Notes and Introduction

Recorded research uses

AT-1401

Corpus Hermeticum

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Brian P. Copenhaver's critical translation, notes and introduction for the philosophical Hermetica; establishes the late-antique textual corpus while keeping the Greek treatises distinct from the Latin Asclepius and technical Hermetica.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-1409

Emerald Tablet

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Copenhaver's critical source for the philosophical Hermetica and a boundary control: the Emerald Tablet is not a treatise in the Greek Corpus Hermeticum and must retain its separate Arabic–Latin history.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic
AT-1850

Hermeticism

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Brian P. Copenhaver's scholarly translation and commentary for the philosophical Hermetica; primary textual baseline for late-antique teachings and terminology, not evidence for prehistoric authorship or an unchanged Egyptian mystery school.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Corpus Hermeticum

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Corpus Hermeticum is a collection of Greek philosophical-religious Hermetic treatises attributed to Hermes Trismegistus.

The Corpus Hermeticum is essential for the map because it is one of the major sources behind Hermeticism, Renaissance esotericism, occult revival, and modern ancient-wisdom claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The philosophical Hermetica address divine mind, cosmos, soul, piety, rebirth, knowledge, and salvation in a late-antique religious-philosophical setting.

The Corpus Hermeticum is essential for the map because it is one of the major sources behind Hermeticism, Renaissance esotericism, occult revival, and modern ancient-wisdom claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The philosophical Hermetica belong to a late-antique Greco-Egyptian setting; the catalog does not support a prehistoric, pre-flood, or Atlantean source date.

The Corpus Hermeticum is essential for the map because it is one of the major sources behind Hermeticism, Renaissance esotericism, occult revival, and modern ancient-wisdom claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The texts have a Greco-Egyptian religious setting and Hermes-Thoth identity, while modern scholarship places their Greek philosophical corpus in late antiquity.

Answer / theory: It has Egyptian religious atmosphere and Hermes-Thoth identity, but modern scholarship places the texts in late antique Greek-speaking contexts. What supports it: Language, philosophical context, and Casaubon’s dating critique. What is weak or disputed: Claims of direct pharaonic or Atlantean transmission lack evidence. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for late antique origin; Weak Evidence for prehistoric origin.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Tablet has an Egyptian-themed Hermetic attribution, but its accessible textual trail is medieval Arabic and Latin rather than a verified pharaonic artifact.

Answer / theory: It is attributed to Hermes Trismegistus and has Egyptian-themed Hermetic identity, but the accessible source trail is medieval Arabic and Latin. What supports it: Manuscript history and scholarship. What is weak or disputed: Direct pharaonic origin is not demonstrated. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for Hermetic-alchemical transmission; Weak Evidence for pharaonic artifact claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The catalog establishes late-antique Hermetic texts and later Renaissance and modern reception, but it does not support a single unbroken prehistoric science tradition.

Hermeticism is one of the key esoteric bridges in the map. It connects ancient texts, alchemy, Renaissance magic, Kabbalah, Gnosticism comparisons, and modern occultism. Its real history is rich enough without forcing it into unsupported prehistoric claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The surviving philosophical Hermetica are treated in the listed scholarship as late-antique, Greco-Egyptian, and syncretic, not as unchanged pharaonic revelation.

Answer / theory: It has Egyptianizing and Greco-Egyptian elements, but surviving key texts are late antique and syncretic. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed late-antique textual scholarship and reception history do not support claims that the Corpus Hermeticum preserves unchanged prehistoric, pre-flood, or Atlantean wisdom.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The known Arabic-Latin source trail supports a real Hermetic-alchemical text but not a recovered prehistoric Egyptian or Atlantean artifact or universal scientific law.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The Kybalion is a 1908 modern claim source, not an ancient witness to the philosophical Hermetica.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius

Open original 1Open original 2

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions