AT-1422

A Sixth Century Kebra Nagast?

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-1422
Accepted usage IDs: AT-1422
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1422

Kebra Nagast

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Stuart Munro-Hay's peer-reviewed article advancing an earlier-source hypothesis; evidence that composition history remains debated, not a basis for relabeling the extant Ge'ez work as a securely sixth-century manuscript.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Kebra Nagast

Open topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The Kebra Nagast preserves a sacred-national narrative of Solomon, Makeda, Menelik, and the Ark's transfer to Ethiopia; it is not a contemporary tenth-century BCE record.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.

Open claim topic

Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed textual and reception sources do not independently verify the Ark's physical location.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.