ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1429

Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā

DOI · Academic research · Claim origin / tracking

verifiedRetraction / correction review2 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1429
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1429, AT-1445
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research · Claim origin / tracking
Verification
verified
Archive state
acquired-validated-lawful-public-copy
Access
acquired-validated-lawful-public-copy
Rights
license not recorded in legacy manifest; internal research/citation only until rights review; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1429

Avesta

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

study of substitution patterns in a Zoroastrian Sanskrit translation; evidence for textual transmission, not the antiquity of every Avesta passage

What this usage does not establish

Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Open topic
AT-1445

Zoroastrianism

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

study of Zoroastrian Sanskrit translation practice; relevant to later transmission and reception

What this usage does not establish

Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

The Avesta is a layered Zoroastrian sacred corpus transmitted orally and ritually; the extant corpus is partial and survives in manuscripts much later than its oldest Iranian material.

The corpus and its role are clear. Exact dates, authorship, and lost portions remain debated.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Avesta is a layered sacred corpus rather than a single work authored at one time.

Answer / theory: No. It is a layered sacred corpus. What supports it: Its surviving parts include liturgies, hymns, ritual law, prayers, and commentary traditions. What is weak or disputed: Popular summaries flatten it into one scripture like a single-volume Bible. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.

The textual and living tradition are strongly documented. The early source trail, exact dates, and influence pathways are more difficult.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.

Answer / theory: No, not in the crude sense. Fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god. What supports it: Zoroastrian ritual use of fire and scholarly descriptions of fire symbolism. What is weak or disputed: The phrase "fire worship" misrepresents the tradition. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions