ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1437

Book of Changes

URL · Primary evidence / text

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1437
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1437
Types
URL
Roles
Primary evidence / text
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1437

Regional East Asian Sacred Texts

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Chinese Text Project digital primary-text access to the received Zhouyi/Yijing and its textual divisions; establishes the identity of the divination classic while leaving manuscript dating and commentarial layering to specialist scholarship.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Regional East Asian Sacred Texts

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The catalog directly documents Daoist classics, the Zhouyi/Yijing, the Kojiki, and East Asian Buddhist canon infrastructure; Confucian and Korean coverage requires separate sources.

Answer / theory: There is no single list. Key clusters include Confucian classics, Daoist texts, Buddhist canons, Shinto myth-history and ritual texts, and Korean mytho-historical materials. What supports it: Multiple traditions have different canon structures. What is weak or disputed: A single "top texts" list will leave out major traditions. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Zhouyi/Yijing is an early divination classic with later philosophical, cosmological, and commentarial receptions; this does not validate modern deterministic prediction claims.

Answer / theory: It is a divination text that also became a major classic for philosophy, cosmology, and commentary. What supports it: Hexagram structure, ancient divination use, and commentary tradition. What is weak or disputed: Scientific prediction claims are unsupported. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for divination history; Weak Evidence for modern predictive science.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Book of Changes

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions