ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1527

Qur'an 18:50

URL · Primary evidence / text

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1527
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1527
Types
URL
Roles
Primary evidence / text
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1527

Demons

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Primary Qur'anic passage explicitly identifying Iblis as one of the jinn; a key control against calling Iblis an angel or equating all jinn with Christian demons.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

“Demon” is a historically layered translation and reception category rather than one stable ancient species or taxonomy.

Demons are best treated as a layered category, not a single fixed species. The source record includes harmful spirits, disease agents, foreign-god polemics, dead giant spirits, Belial traditions, exorcism enemies, fallen angels, devils, jinn-related beings, magical threats, and folklore figures.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Demons-as-fallen-angels became a strong Christian interpretation but was not a universal ancient baseline.

Answer / theory: No. That is a strong later Christian interpretation, not a universal ancient claim. What supports it: Enochic and Christian traditions connect evil spirits and angelic rebellion. What is weak or disputed: Other traditions use different origin stories. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 18:50 identifies Iblis as one of the jinn and does not establish that all jinn are equivalent to Christian demons.

Answer / theory: Not as a class. Jinn are morally mixed beings in Islam, while shayatin are closer to devils or demonic tempters. What supports it: Qur'an and Islamic theology. What is weak or disputed: Folklore can use jinn for harmful beings, which creates confusion. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 18:50 supports Iblis’s jinn classification, but this catalog does not by itself establish the full moral taxonomy of jinn and shayatin.

Answer / theory: Not as a class. Jinn are morally mixed beings in Islam, while shayatin are closer to devils or demonic tempters. What supports it: Qur'an and Islamic theology. What is weak or disputed: Folklore can use jinn for harmful beings, which creates confusion. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The cataloged ancient and historical sources do not identify demons as archons, aliens, or interdimensional entities.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Qur'an 18:50

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions