AT-1531

Dämonenglaube im Islam

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1531
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1531
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1531

Djinn

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Tobias Nünlist's specialist historical study of demons and related unseen-being categories in Islamic sources; supports keeping jinn, shayāṭīn, Iblis, and imported Christian demon terminology analytically distinct.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 72 and academic scholarship document jinn as a Qur’anic and Islamic interpretive and cultural category of unseen, morally accountable beings.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’anic and Islamic scholarship distinguishes jinn from humans and angels as a tradition-specific category.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Treating all jinn as “Islamic demons” misrepresents distinctions preserved in Qur’anic and Islamic scholarship.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Academic sources document the development of jinn traditions across Qur’anic, exegetical, literary, and folkloric settings.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 72 and later scholarship document morally varied jinn, while regional attributes and behaviors should not be universalized.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Jinn, shayatin, Iblis, ifrit, and later folkloric labels belong to overlapping but non-identical source layers.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Jinn are not equivalent to demons as a class in Qur’anic and mainstream Islamic source traditions.

Answer / theory: No, not as a class. Some jinn can be harmful, and shayatin are demonic tempters, but jinn are morally mixed. What supports it: Qur'an and Islamic theology. What is weak or disputed: English translations and folklore often blur categories. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Some jinn can be harmful, but Qur’an 72 portrays jinn as morally differentiated rather than uniformly demonic.

Answer / theory: No, not as a class. Some jinn can be harmful, and shayatin are demonic tempters, but jinn are morally mixed. What supports it: Qur'an and Islamic theology. What is weak or disputed: English translations and folklore often blur categories. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Angels and jinn are distinct categories in mainstream Islamic interpretation, although exegetical details can vary.

Answer / theory: No. Angels and jinn are distinct categories in mainstream Islamic tradition. What supports it: Qur'anic distinction between angels, jinn, and humans. What is weak or disputed: Iblis's classification is debated, but it does not make all jinn angels. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Qur’an 72 and the listed scholarship do not identify jinn as aliens or interdimensional beings.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Dämonenglaube im Islam

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions