Angels in Islam: Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī's al-Ḥabāʾik fī akhbār al-malāʾik

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-1532
Accepted usage IDs: AT-1532
Types: URL
Roles: Academic research
Verification: partially_verified
Archive state: not assessed in this refresh yet
Access: not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights: link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1532

Djinn

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Stephen Burge's textual study of Islamic angelology; a comparative control for angel/jinn distinctions and the diversity of exegetical positions rather than a comprehensive jinn monograph.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Djinn

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’an 72 and academic scholarship document jinn as a Qur’anic and Islamic interpretive and cultural category of unseen, morally accountable beings.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Qur’anic and Islamic scholarship distinguishes jinn from humans and angels as a tradition-specific category.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Academic sources document the development of jinn traditions across Qur’anic, exegetical, literary, and folkloric settings.

Djinn, or more precisely jinn, should be treated as a major Islamic and Arabian unseen-being category, not as a synonym for demons or genies. The Qur'anic frame is clear enough to anchor the page: jinn are created, hidden, morally responsible beings distinct from humans and angels.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Angels and jinn are distinct categories in mainstream Islamic interpretation, although exegetical details can vary.

Answer / theory: No. Angels and jinn are distinct categories in mainstream Islamic tradition. What supports it: Qur'anic distinction between angels, jinn, and humans. What is weak or disputed: Iblis's classification is debated, but it does not make all jinn angels. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.

Open claim topic

Access and actions

Angels in Islam: Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī's al-Ḥabāʾik fī akhbār al-malāʾik

Open original

Angels in Islam: Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī's al-Ḥabāʾik fī akhbār al-malāʾik

Source record

Recorded research uses

Djinn

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Topics citing it and claims using it

Djinn

Qur’an 72 and academic scholarship document jinn as a Qur’anic and Islamic interpretive and cultural category of unseen, morally accountable beings.

Qur’anic and Islamic scholarship distinguishes jinn from humans and angels as a tradition-specific category.

Academic sources document the development of jinn traditions across Qur’anic, exegetical, literary, and folkloric settings.

Angels and jinn are distinct categories in mainstream Islamic interpretation, although exegetical details can vary.

Access and actions

Search Ancient Inquiry

Ancient Inquiry menu

Visual theme

Prepare an issue report