ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1540

The Politics of Legitimation and the Revival of Popular Religion in Shaanbei, North-Central China

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1540
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1540
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1540

Dragon Kings

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Adam Yuet Chau's peer-reviewed regional ethnography of popular-religion revival, including the Black Dragon King temple context; evidence for a specific modern local cult, not all China.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

The listed sources document locally variable Dragon King traditions associated with water, seas, religious practice, art, literature, and Buddhism; they do not establish extraterrestrial rulers.

The Dragon King tradition is well attested, but the ancient astronaut interpretation is not grounded in primary-source context or physical evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The Black Dragon King temple source documents one modern local cult; it cannot by itself establish rainmaking as the best-attested function of all Dragon Kings.

Answer / theory: Yes. Rainmaking is one of the best-attested Dragon King functions. What supports it: Ritual accounts and temple cults. What is weak or disputed: Whether any ritual caused weather physically is not historically testable in the same way. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for ritual practice.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Texts, art, objects, and local-cult evidence document Dragon Kings as religious and mythological figures; this is not biological evidence for dragons.

Answer / theory: No. They are proof that dragon beings were religiously and mythologically important. What supports it: Texts, art, and ritual. What is weak or disputed: Biological dragon existence. Evidence level: Weak Evidence for literal dragons.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

East Asian Buddhist translation and imagery can render nāga kings as Dragon Kings, but that usage does not define every Chinese Dragon King tradition.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Nāga and Dragon King traditions overlap through Buddhist transmission without being identical across regions, periods, or religious settings.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed religious, art-historical, ethnographic, and object sources do not establish Dragon Kings as biological non-human rulers or ancient extraterrestrials.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Politics of Legitimation and the Revival of Popular Religion in Shaanbei, North-Central China

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions