AT-1572

Is Shamanism Timeless? Archaeological Perspectives on Religious Continuity and Change

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1572
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1572
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://doi.org/10.1080/policies-text-data-mining; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1572

Shamanism

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

archaeological assessment of continuity and change in shamanism; cautions against treating the category as timeless

What this usage does not establish

Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Comparative scholarship identifies recurrent ritual-specialist patterns, but shamanism remains a debated category historically grounded in Siberian contexts rather than one global institution.

The ethnographic and historical base is strong, but the category becomes weaker as it moves farther from local traditions and into universal prehistoric claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Spirit mediation and altered-state ritual may be ancient, but the listed historical and archaeological sources do not identify one continuous oldest religion called shamanism.

Answer / theory: It may preserve very old patterns of spirit mediation, healing, and altered-state ritual, but it cannot be identified as one single oldest religion. What supports it: Cross-cultural recurrence and possible prehistoric ritual evidence. What is weak or disputed: Direct prehistoric proof is limited. Evidence level: Plausible but Unproven.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Shamanic readings of cave art are interpretive hypotheses; hybrid imagery or deep-cave setting alone cannot identify a specific ritual specialist.

Answer / theory: Some cave art may fit shamanic interpretation, especially hybrid figures and deep-cave ritual settings. What supports it: Ethnographic parallels, trance imagery arguments, and animal-human transformation motifs. What is weak or disputed: Archaeology alone rarely proves a shamanic role. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Is Shamanism Timeless? Archaeological Perspectives on Religious Continuity and Change

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions