ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1613

Denise Schmandt-Besserat, “Decipherment of the Earliest Tablets” (1981)

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1613
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1613
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1613

Origin of Writing

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Peer-reviewed early-tablet analysis central to the accounting-origin argument

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Origin of Writing

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Uruk proto-cuneiform is among the earliest robust writing evidence, while the boundary between notation, proto-writing, and writing remains debated.

Answer / theory: Proto-cuneiform at Uruk is among the strongest earliest writing evidence, but numerical tablets and symbol systems complicate the boundary. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for proto-cuneiform, mixed for exact first-writing claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Mesopotamian proto-cuneiform is one of the earliest writing traditions.

Answer / theory: Mesopotamian proto-cuneiform is one of the earliest writing traditions. Calling it simply “Sumerian writing” can be too simple for the earliest phases. Evidence level: Strong Evidence with wording caution.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The earliest Mesopotamian writing was not primarily literary or scriptural.

Answer / theory: Not at first in Mesopotamia. The earliest evidence is mainly administrative. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The earliest evidence is mainly administrative.

Answer / theory: Not at first in Mesopotamia. The earliest evidence is mainly administrative. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Denise Schmandt-Besserat, “Decipherment of the Earliest Tablets” (1981)

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions