ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1652

The City of Ugarit at Tell Ras Shamra

URL · Synthesis / reference

partially_verifiedNo recorded retraction flag1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1652
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1652
Types
URL
Roles
Synthesis / reference
Verification
partially_verified
Archive state
not assessed in this refresh yet
Access
not assessed in this refresh yet
Rights
link-and-citation use only unless a documented license or public-domain basis permits more
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
not-applicable/no DOI

Recorded research uses

AT-1652

Ugarit

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Marguerite Yon's archaeological synthesis of the site, excavation history, urban remains, archives, and Late Bronze Age context; a site-history anchor rather than a catalogue of every text.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

Ugarit was a Late Bronze Age Northwest Semitic city in an internationally connected Levantine setting; rigid ethnic labeling remains interpretive.

Answer / theory: It is usually treated as a major Northwest Semitic, Canaanite-related Late Bronze Age city, though its political and cultural world was internationally connected. What supports it: Ugaritic language, religious texts, regional setting, and cultural parallels. What is weak or disputed: Exact ethnic labels can be too modern if applied rigidly. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for cultural-linguistic connection, mixed for simplified ethnic labels.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Ugarit used an important alphabetic cuneiform writing system, but alphabet history cannot be reduced to Ugarit alone.

Answer / theory: Ugarit used an important alphabetic cuneiform writing system, but alphabet history is wider and cannot be reduced to Ugarit alone. What supports it: Ugaritic alphabetic tablets and abecedaries. What is weak or disputed: “First alphabet” claims often ignore Proto-Sinaitic, Phoenician, and other related developments. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for Ugaritic alphabetic writing, weak for exclusive invention claims.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Ugarit was destroyed during the wider Late Bronze Age collapse horizon.

Answer / theory: Ugarit was destroyed during the wider Late Bronze Age collapse. Causes likely involved a combination of war, trade disruption, political instability, and regional crisis. What supports it: Archaeological destruction layer and historical context of regional collapse. What is weak or disputed: A single-cause explanation, such as only Sea Peoples or only drought, is too narrow. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for destruction, mixed evidence for exact cause.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The exact causes of Ugarit’s destruction remain debated; the catalog does not justify either a single cause or an exact universal causal formula.

Answer / theory: Ugarit was destroyed during the wider Late Bronze Age collapse. Causes likely involved a combination of war, trade disruption, political instability, and regional crisis. What supports it: Archaeological destruction layer and historical context of regional collapse. What is weak or disputed: A single-cause explanation, such as only Sea Peoples or only drought, is too narrow. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for destruction, mixed evidence for exact cause.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

The City of Ugarit at Tell Ras Shamra

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions