The Ugaritic Baal Cycle

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: AT-1653
Accepted usage IDs: AT-1653
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1653

Ugarit

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Mark S. Smith's specialist edition and commentary; use for tablet- and passage-specific readings of the Baal Cycle rather than generalized summaries of all Ugaritic religion.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Ugarit

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Ugaritic evidence places Israelite and biblical traditions within a wider West Semitic cultural and religious environment without proving direct dependence for every passage.

The source base is strong, but the interpretation must remain precise. Ugarit strongly supports cultural and linguistic context. It does not automatically settle every question of biblical dependence.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Ugaritic and biblical materials provide strong evidence of shared West Semitic religious and literary background without making the traditions identical.

Answer / theory: It strongly shows shared West Semitic religious and literary background. Direct copying has to be argued passage by passage. What supports it: Parallels in divine council imagery, storm-god language, sea-combat motifs, and poetic vocabulary. What is weak or disputed: Broad “copied from Ugarit” claims are usually too blunt. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for shared context, mixed evidence for direct borrowing claims.

Open claim topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Direct borrowing from Ugaritic into a specific biblical passage must be argued passage by passage; similarity alone is insufficient.

Answer / theory: It strongly shows shared West Semitic religious and literary background. Direct copying has to be argued passage by passage. What supports it: Parallels in divine council imagery, storm-god language, sea-combat motifs, and poetic vocabulary. What is weak or disputed: Broad “copied from Ugarit” claims are usually too blunt. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for shared context, mixed evidence for direct borrowing claims.

Open claim topic

Access and actions

The Ugaritic Baal Cycle

Open original

Source record

Recorded research uses

Ugarit

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Topics citing it and claims using it

Ugarit

Ugaritic evidence places Israelite and biblical traditions within a wider West Semitic cultural and religious environment without proving direct dependence for every passage.

Ugaritic and biblical materials provide strong evidence of shared West Semitic religious and literary background without making the traditions identical.

Direct borrowing from Ugaritic into a specific biblical passage must be argued passage by passage; similarity alone is insufficient.

Access and actions

Search Ancient Inquiry

Ancient Inquiry menu

Visual theme

Prepare an issue report