ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1662

Absolute Chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: High-Resolution Radiocarbon Dating

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1662
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1662
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1662

Megiddo / Armageddon

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

High-resolution radiocarbon study of Megiddo's Late Bronze and Iron Age sequence; use for archaeological chronology and dating uncertainty, not for the meaning of Armageddon in Revelation.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Megiddo / Armageddon

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Tel Megiddo is a documented archaeological site with stratified Bronze and Iron Age remains.

Answer / theory: Megiddo is the archaeological site. Armageddon is the apocalyptic name in Revelation, usually linked to Har Megiddo. What supports it: Revelation 16:16 and the historical memory of Megiddo. What is weak or disputed: The exact etymology and symbolic meaning are debated. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for the link, mixed evidence for specific interpretation.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Older 'Solomonic' attributions at Megiddo have been reassessed through stratigraphy, radiocarbon chronology, and regional comparison; specific redatings remain debated.

Answer / theory: Older excavators linked some structures to Solomon, but later scholarship has debated and redated parts of the Iron Age sequence. What supports it: Biblical memory of royal building and earlier excavation interpretation. What is weak or disputed: Stratigraphy and chronology remain debated. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

At Megiddo, stratigraphy and dated occupation phases support long-term settlement accumulation rather than a single mud-flood or reset event.

Answer / theory: No. A tel forms through repeated human occupation, rebuilding, collapse, debris accumulation, and erosion over long periods. What supports it: Standard archaeological stratigraphy at tells across the Near East. What is weak or disputed: Mud-flood interpretations usually ignore excavation methods and layer-by-layer dating. Evidence level: Debunked or Very Unlikely for mud-flood claims.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Revelation's Armageddon is an apocalyptic textual place-name; Megiddo archaeology cannot verify a future battle, and the name's exact derivation remains disputed.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Absolute Chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: High-Resolution Radiocarbon Dating

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions