ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-1833

Review of The Order of Days: The Maya World and the Truth about 2012

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-1833
Accepted usage IDs
AT-1833
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction
Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-1833

Maya 2012 Cycle

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Stable academic-library review record for David Stuart's specialist book correcting the doomsday reading and explaining Long Count practice.

What this usage does not establish

Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Supporting citation for public claim

A major cycle completed, but the calendar did not simply end.

Answer / theory: No. A major cycle completed, but the calendar did not simply end. What supports it: Long Count structure and known dates beyond 2012. What is weak or disputed: Public wording often confuses a period ending with the end of time. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

No listed specialist source identifies a secure ancient Maya text predicting a 2012 end of the world.

Answer / theory: No secure ancient Maya text says that. What supports it: Specialist readings of Tortuguero and La Corona texts. What is weak or disputed: Tortuguero Monument 6 is damaged, but damage does not justify the apocalypse claim. Evidence level: Debunked or Very Unlikely for the apocalypse version.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The 2012 date was significant as a major Long Count period ending, not a terminal end of Maya time.

Answer / theory: Yes, as a major Long Count period ending. What supports it: The mathematical structure of the Long Count and inscriptional references. What is weak or disputed: The meaning of that importance is not the same as doomsday. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for calendrical importance.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The ancient Maya did not predict that the world would end on December 21, 2012; that doomsday reading is a modern misrepresentation of a Long Count period ending.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

A 2012 consciousness shift is a modern New Age interpretation, not a claim established by ancient Maya inscriptions.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

The listed sources treat Nibiru and Planet X links to 2012 as modern additions with no ancient Maya textual basis.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Review of The Order of Days: The Maya World and the Truth about 2012

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions