V3F-0019

Joel S. Baden (2012), The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis, Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300152647.

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review1 usage record

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.

Canonical source ID: V3F-0019
Accepted usage IDs: V3F-0019
Types: DOI
Roles: Academic research
Verification: verified
Archive state: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access: unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights: not identified; not cleared
Public reproduction: Not cleared; citation and link only.
Correction / retraction: no retraction flag in checked metadata

Recorded research uses

V3F-0019

Genesis Flood

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

Specialist source-critical study supporting analysis of Priestly and non-Priestly compositional strata.

What this usage does not establish

Documentary/source-critical reconstruction is a scholarly model with continuing debate; it is not a claim about flood geology.

Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Genesis Flood

Open topic

Supporting citation for public claim

Source-critical scholarship commonly analyzes Genesis 6–9 as combining Priestly and non-Priestly materials, while the reconstruction remains a scholarly compositional model.

Many scholars identify priestly and non-priestly materials in the final narrative, while the number, boundaries, and development of proposed layers remain debated.

Open claim topic

Access and actions

Joel S. Baden (2012), The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis, Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300152647.

Open original

Joel S. Baden (2012), The Composition of the Pentateuch: Renewing the Documentary Hypothesis, Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300152647.

Source record

Recorded research uses

Genesis Flood

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

What this usage does not establish

Topics citing it and claims using it

Genesis Flood

Source-critical scholarship commonly analyzes Genesis 6–9 as combining Priestly and non-Priestly materials, while the reconstruction remains a scholarly compositional model.

Access and actions

Search Ancient Inquiry

Ancient Inquiry menu

Visual theme

Prepare an issue report