ANCIENT INQUIRY
AT-0044

Archaic ancestry inference in imputed ancient human genomes

DOI · Academic research

verifiedRetraction / correction review2 usage records

Source record

This is one canonical bibliographic record with topic-scoped research-use entries. It does not reproduce the paper, book, text, dataset, image, or manuscript and does not imply that full text was reviewed.
Canonical source ID
AT-0044
Accepted usage IDs
AT-0044, AT-0465
Types
DOI
Roles
Academic research
Verification
verified
Archive state
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Access
unavailable-through-registered-public-or-tdm-routes
Rights
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0; not cleared
Public reproduction
Permitted only under the exact recorded Creative Commons terms and required attribution; verify the asset-specific license before reuse.
Correction / retraction
no retraction flag in checked Crossref/OpenAlex metadata

Recorded research uses

AT-0044

Neanderthal and Denisovan Admixture

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

method for recovering and tracking archaic ancestry in low-coverage ancient genomes

What this usage does not establish

Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Open topic
AT-0465

Human Origins

Why Ancient Inquiry uses this citation here

methodological evidence for reconstructing archaic ancestry through time in ancient human genomes

What this usage does not establish

Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Open topic

Topics citing it and claims using it

Topic citing this source

Neanderthal and Denisovan Admixture

Open topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed catalog supports fossil, population-history, and archaic-admixture claims; it does not source mythic, theological, or modern alternative-origin claims.

The scientific evidence and mythic source evidence are both strong in their own categories. Problems arise when categories are mixed without evidence.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

The listed ancestry synthesis supports structured African populations and admixture rather than a single isolated founding population.

Answer / theory: This is a theological claim. Population genetics does not support a recent two-person bottleneck as the biological origin of all humans. What supports it: Religious interpretation of Genesis. What is weak or disputed: Biological population evidence. Evidence level: Religious claim, weak as scientific model.
Open claim topic
Supporting citation for public claim

Neanderthals and Denisovans are archaic human relatives whose admixture contributed ancestry to some living populations.

Answer / theory: Yes. They are close archaic relatives and contributed ancestry to some modern populations. What supports it: Ancient DNA. What is weak or disputed: Exact Denisovan fossil identity and population structure continue to evolve. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Open claim topic
Limiting / critical citation for public claim

Modern Anunnaki and alien-engineering literature reinterprets human-origin texts technologically, but the cited fossil, genetics, and critical textual sources do not support that account.

The evidence does not automatically support broader causal, technological, transmission, or literalizing claims beyond the cited record.
Open claim topic

Access and actions

Archaic ancestry inference in imputed ancient human genomes

Open original

Search Ancient Inquiry

Open complete search

Visual theme

Theme intensity changes decoration only. Evidence and relationship semantics never change.

Prepare an issue report

This static site cannot transmit a correction by itself. It prepares a complete report with page and build provenance for the published corrections channel.

Open corrections instructions