Overview
Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism is associated with the prophet Zarathustra, called Zoroaster in Greek tradition, and with devotion to Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord. Its central ideas include asha, often translated as truth, order, or rightness; druj, deceit or disorder; moral choice; ritual discipline; reverence for fire and water; and an eventual renewal of the world. The textual base is the Avesta, especially the Gathas within the Yasna. The source history is difficult. The oldest Avestan materials were transmitted orally for long periods, the known written canon was shaped under the Sasanians, and the surviving manuscripts are much later. This means the religion is ancient, but the source trail must be handled carefully.
Evidence on this page
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Important limits
- Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Current assessment
This assessment belongs to this record only. A connection never transfers evidence status from another topic.
Source foundation
5 public source records are linked to this topic. Source quantity does not replace source quality or methodological review.
- 3 Reference
- 1 Academic
- 1 Claim Tracking
2 academic-paper records · 0 with explicit free-full-text or open-access status
Evidence and claims
Recorded claims
Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
What the cited material supports
The textual and living tradition are strongly documented. The early source trail, exact dates, and influence pathways are more difficult.
Canonical sources cited
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest · reference
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism · academic
- Zoroastrianism · reference
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā · claim-tracking
Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
Well supportedWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Zoroastrianism
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
Claim Tracking · verified
Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
What the cited material supports
Answer / theory: Both labels capture part of the tradition. Ahura Mazda is supreme, but strong dualistic structures are central in many layers. What supports it: Ahura Mazda's centrality and opposition to destructive evil. What is weak or disputed: One label hides internal complexity. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Canonical sources cited
Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
Active debateWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.
What the cited material supports
Answer / theory: Both labels capture part of the tradition. Ahura Mazda is supreme, but strong dualistic structures are central in many layers. What supports it: Ahura Mazda's centrality and opposition to destructive evil. What is weak or disputed: One label hides internal complexity. Evidence level: Mixed Evidence.
Canonical sources cited
The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.
Active debateWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.
What the cited material supports
Answer / theory: No, not in the crude sense. Fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god. What supports it: Zoroastrian ritual use of fire and scholarly descriptions of fire symbolism. What is weak or disputed: The phrase "fire worship" misrepresents the tradition. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Canonical sources cited
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism · academic
- Zoroastrianism · reference
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā · claim-tracking
Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.
Misrepresented sourceWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Zoroastrianism
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
Claim Tracking · verified
Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.
What the cited material supports
Answer / theory: No, not in the crude sense. Fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god. What supports it: Zoroastrian ritual use of fire and scholarly descriptions of fire symbolism. What is weak or disputed: The phrase "fire worship" misrepresents the tradition. Evidence level: Strong Evidence.
Canonical sources cited
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism · academic
- Zoroastrianism · reference
In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.
Well supportedWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Zoroastrianism
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
What the cited material supports
Answer / theory: Zarathustra was the prophetic figure associated with the Gathas and the reforming religious vision of the tradition. What supports it: Avestan tradition and later religious memory. What is weak or disputed: Exact date, homeland, and biography. Evidence level: Strong Evidence for tradition; Mixed Evidence for biography.
Canonical sources cited
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book · reference
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism · academic
- Zoroastrianism · reference
Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
Active debateWhere the interpretations diverge
See Internet Folklore and Claim Mutation section.
What the cited evidence does not establish
Follow the claim source trail
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
- Zoroastrianism
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Evidence Ledger
AVESTA i
AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
What this supports
- Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
- Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
What this does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Follow the Source
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
ZOROASTRIANISM i
ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
What this supports
- Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
- Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
- The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.
What this does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Follow the Source
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
What this supports
- Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
- Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
- The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.
- Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.
- In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.
- Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
What this does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Follow the Source
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Academic · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism
What this supports
- Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
- Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.
- In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.
- Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
What this does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Follow the Source
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- Zoroastrianism
Reference · partially_verified
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
What this supports
No direct public claim-support relationship is recorded for this evidence item.
What this does not establish
Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Follow the Source
This trail lists canonical source records attached to this item. Display order does not imply evidentiary rank or historical sequence.
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
Claim Tracking · verified
Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
View as Evidence Matrix
Each row remains a separate evidence record. One proxy or finding does not automatically determine the assessment of an entire compound claim.
| ID | Evidence | Supports | Challenges | Main limitation | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM-244-EV-001 | AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book | Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.; Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event. | No direct public challenge relationship recorded | Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read. | 1 |
| CM-244-EV-002 | ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest | Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.; Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.; The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer. | No direct public challenge relationship recorded | Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read. | 1 |
| CM-244-EV-003 | Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism | Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.; Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.; The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.; Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.; In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.; Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event. | No direct public challenge relationship recorded | Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read. | 1 |
| CM-244-EV-004 | Zoroastrianism | Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.; Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.; In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.; Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event. | No direct public challenge relationship recorded | Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read. | 1 |
| CM-244-EV-005 | Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā | No direct public support relationship recorded | No direct public challenge relationship recorded | Acquisition does not imply full methodological review. | 1 |
Timeline
~1500 – 1000 BCE founding
Approximate ordering never replaces this visible date basis.
Indo-Iranian background: Religious vocabulary and ritual patterns develop before Zoroastrianism can be isolated.
Approximate ordering never replaces this visible date basis.
Local Atlas Map
Accessible local relationship list
Zoroastrianism → Persia / Achaemenid Empire
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
A direct historical-context edge does not make every Achaemenid subject Zoroastrian or project all later doctrine unchanged into royal inscriptions.
Supporting sources: ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Zoroastrianism → Avesta
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
A direct text-to-tradition relationship does not make the extant corpus complete, erase oral and ritual practice, or let textual scholarship speak for every living Zoroastrian community.
Supporting sources: AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book, The Multimedia Yasna, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism → Avesta
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
The textual relationship does not make the extant Avesta complete or exhaust living ritual, oral, communal, and later interpretive tradition.
Supporting sources: AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism, Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism → Supreme Creator Concepts
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
The edge does not settle a simple monotheism-versus-dualism label or make one textual layer representative of all Zoroastrian theology and practice.
Supporting sources: ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Documented connections
Zoroastrianism → Persia / Achaemenid Empire
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
A direct historical-context edge does not make every Achaemenid subject Zoroastrian or project all later doctrine unchanged into royal inscriptions.
Supporting sources: ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Zoroastrianism → Avesta
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
A direct text-to-tradition relationship does not make the extant corpus complete, erase oral and ritual practice, or let textual scholarship speak for every living Zoroastrian community.
Supporting sources: AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book, The Multimedia Yasna, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism → Avesta
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
The textual relationship does not make the extant Avesta complete or exhaust living ritual, oral, communal, and later interpretive tradition.
Supporting sources: AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism, Zoroastrianism
Zoroastrianism → Supreme Creator Concepts
Inspect connection as text
What this does not prove
The edge does not settle a simple monotheism-versus-dualism label or make one textual layer representative of all Zoroastrian theology and practice.
Supporting sources: ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest, Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Sources
Academic papers
2 paper citations support or limit this topic; 0 carry explicit free-full-text or open-access status.
Academic
Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this source
Mary Boyce's academic sourcebook for Avestan and Middle Persian source layers, doctrines, ritual, and historical orientation; a catalogue locator for the work, not a substitute for passage-level citation.
What it does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Claim Tracking
Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this source
study of Zoroastrian Sanskrit translation practice; relevant to later transmission and reception
What it does not establish
Acquisition does not imply full methodological review.
Other sources
Reference
AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this source
Jean Kellens's specialist Encyclopaedia Iranica survey for the Avesta's layered contents, oral and written transmission, and Sasanian canon problem; use for historical-textual framing rather than for confessional claims.
What it does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this source
Encyclopaedia Iranica historical synthesis for the religion's Iranian development through the Sasanian period; supports a layered chronology without treating Achaemenid Mazda worship as identical to every later doctrine.
What it does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Zoroastrianism
Why Ancient Inquiry uses this source
Federation of Zoroastrian Associations of North America community-controlled introduction; use for living-community self-description and practice, not as independent proof of ancient chronology or influence on later religions.
What it does not establish
Bibliographic verification does not by itself establish that the full text was read.
Research detail
Topic ID: CM-244 Last reviewed: 2026-08-10 Corrections: /corrections/ Change history: Recorded in the Connected Atlas topic changelog.
Overview
Zoroastrianism is associated with the prophet Zarathustra, called Zoroaster in Greek tradition, and with devotion to Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord. Its central ideas include asha, often translated as truth, order, or rightness; druj, deceit or disorder; moral choice; ritual discipline; reverence for fire and water; and an eventual renewal of the world. The textual base is the Avesta, especially the Gathas within the Yasna. The source history is difficult. The oldest Avestan materials were transmitted orally for long periods, the known written canon was shaped under the Sasanians, and the surviving manuscripts are much later. This means the religion is ancient, but the source trail must be handled carefully.
Plain-language explanation
Zoroastrianism is built around a moral and cosmic struggle between truth/order and deceit/disorder. The central divine figure is Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord. Human beings are expected to choose truth, good thought, good word, and good action. Fire is one of the most visible symbols of Zoroastrian practice. It represents purity, light, truth, and sacred order. This does not mean Zoroastrians worship fire as a god. The more accurate framing is that fire is a sacred medium and ritual focus.
Historical and scholarly context
Zoroastrianism should be described as ancient, Iranian, textually complex, and living. It is often called one of the world's oldest monotheistic religions, but that label needs caution. Ahura Mazda is supreme, yet the tradition also includes Amesha Spentas, yazatas, and a powerful evil opposition in Angra Mainyu or Ahriman, especially in later texts. This makes the monotheism-dualism question complex.
The Avesta is a layered corpus, not one book written at one moment. Old Avestan materials are distinct from later Young Avestan texts. The known written canon was shaped under Sasanian authority, and surviving manuscripts are medieval. Oral transmission was central.
Influence on later religions is plausible in some broad areas, especially during Persian imperial contact and Second Temple Jewish development, but direct lines are difficult to prove. The responsible wording is "possible influence," "shared late ancient religious environment," or "scholarly debate."
What the evidence supports
The strongest evidence for Zoroastrianism's importance is the Avestan corpus, the antiquity of Old Avestan materials, the centrality of Ahura Mazda and asha, the long ritual tradition, Sasanian canon formation, and the survival of Zoroastrian communities. Persian imperial history also makes Mazda-centered religion important for the ancient Near East.
Limits and disputed claims
- Exact dates for Zarathustra stated too confidently.
- Treating Achaemenid Ahura Mazda references as proof of every later doctrine.
- Direct one-to-one borrowing claims for Judaism, Christianity, or Islam.
- Fire worship caricature.
- Pure dualism oversimplification.
- Greek reports on the Magi used without caution.
- Modern occult uses of Zoroaster, Ahriman, or the Magi presented as primary doctrine.
Claim status
- Well supported: Zoroastrianism is a living religious tradition with ancient Iranian roots; historical, textual, and community sources document Ahura Mazda, asha, ethical choice, ritual, and opposition to deceit and destructive evil.
- Active debate: Applying either 'monotheistic' or 'dualistic' alone can obscure variation across Zoroastrian textual and historical layers.
- Active debate: The sources support Ahura Mazda's centrality and strong dualist structures, while the best classificatory language varies by textual and historical layer.
- Misrepresented source: Calling Zoroastrians 'fire worshipers' in the sense of worshiping fire as a god misrepresents ritual scholarship and community self-description.
- Well supported: In Zoroastrian practice, fire is sacred and ritually central, but it is not worshiped as a god.
- Active debate: Zoroastrian tradition associates Zarathustra with the Gathas, but the catalog does not establish a detailed biography, exact date or homeland, or one simple reform event.
Sources
- AVESTA i. Survey of the history and contents of the book — https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/avesta-holy-book
- ZOROASTRIANISM i. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest — https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/zoroastrianism-i-historical-review
- Textual Sources for the Study of Zoroastrianism — https://openlibrary.org/works/OL19526179W
- Zoroastrianism — https://fezana.org/zoroastrianism/
- Patterns of Substitution in the Zoroastrian Sanskrit Translation of Ogamadecā — https://doi.org/10.12797/cis.28.2026.01.12
This public draft omits internal numeric scoring and administrative notes. Claim labels describe evidentiary status, not topic importance.